MOD-01 · Artifact

Hub readiness scorecard

Model v0.1

Fifteen questions across the five layers of the model. Answer honestly, get a readiness level, and share the exact assessment as a link. Certification is what makes hubs comparable — this is the sketch of that idea.

Facility and infrastructure

Reliable power supply for continuous operation No Partial Yes

Usable floor space with layout flexibility No Partial Yes

Inbound and outbound logistics access No Partial Yes

People and training

Operators trained for the current process set No Partial Yes

A repeatable training program, not tribal knowledge No Partial Yes

Documented safety procedures in daily use No Partial Yes

Modular cells and tooling

Stations and cells follow a standard, repeatable layout No Partial Yes

Tooling inventory is tracked and maintained No Partial Yes

Changeovers follow documented procedures No Partial Yes

Factory OS and data

Work instructions are digital and versioned No Partial Yes

Product and process revisions are controlled No Partial Yes

Production data is captured: quality, capacity, traceability No Partial Yes

Quality and certification

Incoming and outgoing inspection are routine No Partial Yes

Defects feed a corrective-action loop No Partial Yes

The hub could stand an external audit today No Partial Yes

Record assessment in the addressScoring needs JavaScript, which is disabled here. Submitting still encodes your answers into the page address — share that link and the score appears for anyone opening it with JavaScript on. The scoring rule is documented below, so the level can also be read off by hand.

How the model works — v0.1

Every criterion scores 0 (no), 1 (partial), or 2 (yes) — thirty points total. Under 40% is Not ready; 40–64% is Foundational; 65–84% is Certifiable; 85% and above is Routable — the level where capacity becomes comparable across hubs. The weakest layer is called out, because readiness is limited by the weakest layer, not the average.

Status

This is model v0.1 — a deliberately simple draft, published so it can be corrected in the Stage 0 expert interviews. Criteria weights are flat on purpose; whether some layers should dominate is one of the questions for the interviews. Corrections: shk@moduloa.com.

Documentation, decisions, and build logs accumulate here. Everything is public.